A Double Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group Study of Sativex in the Treatment of Subjects With Pain Due to Diabetic Neuropathy - Medical Cannabis Research Engine
Results are reported by the registry submitter and preserved exactly. They are not independent verification or a treatment recommendation.
Registry facts
Study at a glance
Phase
PHASE3
Enrollment
297 (ACTUAL)
Start date
2005-07
Sponsor
Jazz Pharmaceuticals
Design
RANDOMIZED · PARALLEL · SUPPORTIVE CARE
Locations
1
Results record
Present in registry snapshot
This was a 15 week (one week baseline and fourteen weeks treatment period), multicentre, double blind, randomised, placebo controlled, parallel group study to evaluate the efficacy of Sativex in subjects with pain due to diabetic neuropathy. Subjects were screened to determine eligibility and completed a seven-day baseline period. Subjects then returned to the centre for assessment, randomisation and dose introduction. Visits occurred at the end of weeks two, six, ten and at the end of the study (treatment week 14) or earlier if they withdrew. A follow up visit occurred 28 days after completion or withdrawal. Subjects in this study were given the opportunity to be enrolled in an open label extension study.
PainDiabetic NeuropathyPaindiabetic neuropathy
Linked local records
Related local records
Local links use governed condition terms or exact source-reported intervention names. They are navigation candidates, not efficacy claims.
containing THC (27 mg/ml):CBD (25 mg/ml), in ethanol:propylene glycol (50:50) excipients, with peppermint oil (0.05%) flavouring. Maximum permitted dose was eight actuations in any three hour period and 24 actuations (THC 65 mg: CBD 60 mg) in 24 hours
Results are reported by the registry submitter and preserved exactly. They are not independent verification or a treatment recommendation.
Primary outcomes
2
Secondary outcomes
8
Statistical analyses
8
Adverse-event terms
66
PRIMARYThe Change From Baseline in Mean Diabetic Neuropathy Pain 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale Score at the End of Treatment (Average of Last 7 Days Treatment)
Time frame
Day 0 to Day 98
Measure
MEAN · units on a scale
Reporting status
POSTED
The diabetic neuropathy pain Numerical Rating Scale was complete at the end of every day. The patient was asked "on a scale of '0 to 10', please indicate the number that best describes your nerve pain due to diabetes in the last 24 hours" where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain. No pain relates to the time prior to the onset of pain due to diabetic neuropathy. For those whose evaluable period ended before Day 7, the mean of the available post-randomisation data was used. Those with no post-baseline diary pain 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale scores were excluded from the analysis.
Population: The primary population for analysis was the full analysis set, which included all randomised subjects who received at least one dose of study medication and yielded on-treatment efficacy data.
Group
N
Value
Spread / interval
Sativex
146
-1.67
2.13
Placebo
148
-1.55
2.09
Statistical analyses
Sativex vs PlaceboANCOVAestimated treatment effect: -0.12p-value: 0.63495% CI · -0.60 · 0.36
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Mean Neuropathic Pain Scale Score at the End of Treatment
Eligibility
Population and criteria
Sex
ALL
Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
Not reported
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted
Inclusion criteria
Willing and able to give informed consent.
Male or female, aged 18 years or above.
Ability (in the investigators opinion) and willingness to comply with all study requirements.
Diagnosed with Type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus as diagnosed according to the World Health Organisation (WHO) criteria.
Diagnosed with neuropathic pain due to distal symmetrical diabetic neuropathy of at least six months duration, as defined by a NDS score of at least 4, and in who pain is not wholly relieved with their current therapy. The NDS score must be attained from at least two different test parameters and not only the ankle jerk reflex.
The last six daily diary 0-10 NRS pain scores before randomisation summed to at least 24.
Stable dose of regular pain medication and non-pharmacological therapies (including TENS) for at least 14 days prior to the screening visit and willingness for these to be maintained throughout the study.
Agreement for the responsible authorities (as applicable in individual countries), their primary care physician, and their consultant, if appropriate, to be notified of their participation in the study.
Exclusion criteria
Concomitant pain thought by the investigator to be of a nature or severity to interfere with their assessment of their painful diabetic neuropathy.
Uncontrolled diabetes with HbA1c blood levels of more than 11% at Visit1, Day B1.
Receiving a prohibited medication and were unwilling to stop or comply for the duration of the study.
Has used cannabinoid based medications within 60 days of study entry and were unwilling to abstain for the duration for the study.
Has used cannabis within 30 days of study entry and were unwilling to abstain for the duration for the study.
History of schizophrenia, other psychotic illness, severe personality disorder or other significant psychiatric disorder other than depression associated with their underlying condition.
Known or suspected history of alcohol or substance abuse.
History of epilepsy or recurrent seizures.
Known or suspected hypersensitivity to cannabinoids or any of the excipients of the IMP.
primary outcomes
primary measures
The Change From Baseline in Mean Diabetic Neuropathy Pain 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale Score at the End of Treatment (Average of Last 7 Days Treatment)
Time frame: Day 0 to Day 98
The diabetic neuropathy pain Numerical Rating Scale was complete at the end of every day. The patient was asked "on a scale of '0 to 10', please indicate the number that best describes your nerve pain due to diabetes in the last 24 hours" where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain. No pain relates to the time prior to the onset of pain due to diabetic neuropathy. For those whose evaluable period ended before Day 7, the mean of the available post-randomisation data was used. Those with no post-baseline diary pain 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale scores were excluded from the analysis.
Number of Responders at the 30% Improvement Level at the End of Treatment
Time frame: Day 0 - Day 98
A positive 30% pain response is defined as a reduction of at least 30% in the mean NRS average pain score from baseline to week 14 (last 7 days). The patient was asked "on a scale of '0 to 10', please indicate the number that best describes your pain or average pain in the last 24 hours" where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. No pain relates to the time prior to the onset of pain. The average pain NRS was completed at the same time each day, i.e. bedtime in the evening. Estimates were produced for a one-week period, with the evaluable period finishing at the end of the appropriate seven-day period.
secondary outcomes
secondary measures
Change From Baseline in Mean Neuropathic Pain Scale Score at the End of Treatment
Time frame: Day 0 to Day 98
The Neuropathic Pain Scale score is the 0-100 sum of 10 individual pain scores (0-10 Numerical Rating Scale, 0= no pain to 10 = most pain imaginable). A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement in pain. The baseline mean Neuropathic Pain Scale score was to be the mean of the two assessments during the baseline period, with the end of study value as the mean of the last two assessments made during the evaluable period.
Change From Baseline in Mean Sleep Quality 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale Score at the End of Treatment
Time frame: Day 0 - Day 98
The sleep quality Numerical Rating Scale was completed at the same time each day, i.e. bedtime in the evening. The patient was asked "on a scale of '0 to 10', please indicate the number that best describes your sleep quality in the last 24 hours" where 0 = slept extremely well and 10 = unable to sleep at all. A negative value indicates an improvement in pain score from baseline. The analyses were based on the change from baseline for the last assessment falling within the evaluable period (considered the end of treatment).
Subject Global Impression of Change at the End of Treatment
Time frame: Day 0 and Day 98
The subject was to assess the change in their nerve pain due to diabetic neuropathy at the end of the study compared to baseline on a 7-point scale from very much worse to very much improved. The number of participants reporting each score is presented.
Change From Baseline in Mean Brief Pain Inventory (Short Form)'Pain Severity Composite Score' at the End of Treatment
Time frame: Day 0 and Day 98
The brief pain inventory (short form) is a 14-item questionnaire that asks patients to rate pain over the prior week and the degree to which it interferes with activities on a 0 to 10 scale, where 0=no pain and 10=pain as bad as you can imagine. Severity is measured as worst pain, least pain, average pain, and pain right now. The pain severity composite score was calculated as the arithmetic mean of the four severity items (range 0-10). The minimum value is zero and maximum is 10. A higher score represents a poor outcome.
Publications
Locally readable linked articles
0
No exact PMID-linked public article is currently readable locally.
The Neuropathic Pain Scale score is the 0-100 sum of 10 individual pain scores (0-10 Numerical Rating Scale, 0= no pain to 10 = most pain imaginable). A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement in pain. The baseline mean Neuropathic Pain Scale score was to be the mean of the two assessments during the baseline period, with the end of study value as the mean of the last two assessments made during the evaluable period.
Population: The primary population for analysis was the full analysis set, which included all randomised subjects who received at least one dose of study medication and yielded on-treatment efficacy data.
Group
N
Value
Spread / interval
Sativex
135
-13.70
19.91
Placebo
140
-14.16
17.42
Statistical analyses
Sativex vs PlaceboANCOVAEstimated mean treatment difference: 0.37p-value: 0.86595% CI · -3.87 · 4.61
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Mean Sleep Quality 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale Score at the End of Treatment
Time frame
Day 0 - Day 98
Measure
MEAN · units on a scale
Reporting status
POSTED
The sleep quality Numerical Rating Scale was completed at the same time each day, i.e. bedtime in the evening. The patient was asked "on a scale of '0 to 10', please indicate the number that best describes your sleep quality in the last 24 hours" where 0 = slept extremely well and 10 = unable to sleep at all. A negative value indicates an improvement in pain score from baseline. The analyses were based on the change from baseline for the last assessment falling within the evaluable period (considered the end of treatment).
Population: The primary population for analysis was the full analysis set, which included all randomised subjects who received at least one dose of study medication and yielded on-treatment efficacy data.
Group
N
Value
Spread / interval
Sativex
132
-2.0
3.02
Placebo
142
-1.6
2.76
Statistical analyses
Sativex vs PlaceboANCOVAEstimated mean treatment difference: -0.45p-value: 0.13995% CI · -1.04 · 0.15
SECONDARYSubject Global Impression of Change at the End of Treatment
Time frame
Day 0 and Day 98
Measure
NUMBER · participants
Reporting status
POSTED
The subject was to assess the change in their nerve pain due to diabetic neuropathy at the end of the study compared to baseline on a 7-point scale from very much worse to very much improved. The number of participants reporting each score is presented.
Population: The primary population for analysis was the full analysis set, which included all randomised subjects who received at least one dose of study medication and yielded on-treatment efficacy data.
Group
N
Value
Spread / interval
Sativex
140
13
-
Placebo
141
14
-
Sativex
140
40
-
Placebo
141
36
-
Sativex
140
48
-
Placebo
141
35
-
Sativex
140
30
-
Placebo
141
45
-
Sativex
140
6
-
Placebo
141
9
-
Sativex
140
2
-
Placebo
141
2
-
Sativex
140
1
-
Placebo
141
0
-
Statistical analyses
Sativex vs PlaceboRegression, LogisticOdds Ratio (OR): 1.301p-value: 0.21995% CI · 0.855 · 1.981
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Mean Brief Pain Inventory (Short Form)'Pain Severity Composite Score' at the End of Treatment
Time frame
Day 0 and Day 98
Measure
MEAN · units on a scale
Reporting status
POSTED
The brief pain inventory (short form) is a 14-item questionnaire that asks patients to rate pain over the prior week and the degree to which it interferes with activities on a 0 to 10 scale, where 0=no pain and 10=pain as bad as you can imagine. Severity is measured as worst pain, least pain, average pain, and pain right now. The pain severity composite score was calculated as the arithmetic mean of the four severity items (range 0-10). The minimum value is zero and maximum is 10. A higher score represents a poor outcome.
Population: The primary population for analysis was the full analysis set, which included all randomised subjects who received at least one dose of study medication and yielded on-treatment efficacy data.
Group
N
Value
Spread / interval
Sativex
137
-1.2
1.92
Placebo
135
-1.2
2.06
Statistical analyses
Sativex vs PlaceboANCOVAestimated mean treatment difference: -0.05p-value: 0.84195% CI · -0.51 · 0.42
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Mean Quality of Life EuroQol 5-D Weighted Health State Index Score at the End of Treatment Measured by Visual Analogue Scale
Time frame
Day 0 and Day 98
Measure
MEAN · units on a scale
Reporting status
POSTED
The EuroQol-5D Health Status Visual Analogue Scale rated the health state on a scale of 0-100 with 0 = worst health state imaginable to 100 = best health state imaginable. An increase in score indicates an improvement in condition.
Population: The primary population for analysis was the full analysis set, which included all randomised subjects who received at least one dose of study medication and yielded on-treatment efficacy data.
Group
N
Value
Spread / interval
Sativex
138
3.3
22.26
Placebo
135
7.8
22.91
Statistical analyses
Sativex vs PlaceboANCOVAMedian Difference (Final Values): -0.01p-value: 0.52395% CI · -0.06 · 0.03
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Use of Rescue Analgesia at the End of Treatment
Time frame
Day 0 - Day 98
Measure
MEAN · Tablets
Reporting status
POSTED
The mean daily number of paracetamol tablets used were calculated for the periods over which the primary endpoint was calculated.
Population: The primary population for analysis was the full analysis set, which included all randomised subjects who received at least one dose of study medication and yielded on-treatment efficacy data.
Group
N
Value
Spread / interval
Sativex
146
-0.53
2.02
Placebo
148
-0.35
1.94
Statistical analyses
Sativex vs PlaceboANCOVAestimated mean treatment difference: -0.17p-value: 0.41095% CI · -0.59 · 0.24
SECONDARYIncidence of Adverse Events as a Measure of Subject Safety
Time frame
Day 0 - Day 133
Measure
NUMBER · participants
Reporting status
POSTED
The number of subjects who experienced an adverse event during the course of the study (including the follow-up period i.e 28 days after the end of treatment) is presented.
Population: The primary population for analysis was the full analysis set, which included all randomised subjects who received at least one dose of study medication and yielded on-treatment efficacy data.
Group
N
Value
Spread / interval
Sativex
149
120
-
Placebo
148
101
-
Sativex
149
96
-
Placebo
148
52
-
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Mean Intoxication 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale Score at the End of Treatment
Time frame
Day 0 - Day 98
Measure
MEAN · units on a scale
Reporting status
POSTED
Subjects rated their intoxication levels on a scale of 0-10, where 0 equals "no intoxication" and 10 equals "extreme intoxication". A negaitve value from baseline indicates and improvement. End of treatment was classed as the last on-treatment visit where data was recorded.
Population: The primary population for analysis was the full analysis set, which included all randomised subjects who received at least one dose of study medication and yielded on-treatment efficacy data.
Group
N
Value
Spread / interval
Sativex
142
0.8
2.73
Placebo
145
-0.3
1.96
PRIMARYNumber of Responders at the 30% Improvement Level at the End of Treatment
Time frame
Day 0 - Day 98
Measure
NUMBER · participants
Reporting status
POSTED
A positive 30% pain response is defined as a reduction of at least 30% in the mean NRS average pain score from baseline to week 14 (last 7 days). The patient was asked "on a scale of '0 to 10', please indicate the number that best describes your pain or average pain in the last 24 hours" where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. No pain relates to the time prior to the onset of pain. The average pain NRS was completed at the same time each day, i.e. bedtime in the evening. Estimates were produced for a one-week period, with the evaluable period finishing at the end of the appropriate seven-day period.
Population: All subjects who were randomised and received at least one actuation of study medication were included in the analysis. Subjects with no data during the primary period (i.e. unknown response) were included in the analysis, and were classed as non-responders.
Group
N
Value
Spread / interval
Sativex
149
54
-
Placebo
148
59
-
Statistical analyses
Sativex vs PlaceboRegression, LogisticOdds Ratio (OR): 0.857p-value: 0.52195% CI · 0.537 · 1.370
Participant flow1 period
Overall Study
Milestone
Sativex
Placebo
STARTED
149
148
COMPLETED
105
125
NOT COMPLETED
44
23
Why participants did not complete
Adverse Event: Sativex 30 · Placebo 12
Lack of Efficacy: Sativex 4 · Placebo 5
Withdrawal by Subject: Sativex 5 · Placebo 3
Lost to Follow-up: Sativex 0 · Placebo 1
Refused medication, no side effects: Sativex 1 · Placebo 0
Non-compliance with stable analgesia: Sativex 1 · Placebo 0
Did not meet entry criteria at visit 1: Sativex 1 · Placebo 0
Subject thought medication changed: Sativex 1 · Placebo 0
Ceased treatment due to travel: Sativex 1 · Placebo 0
Felt good so stopped treatment: Sativex 0 · Placebo 1
Baseline4 measures
Age, Categorical
COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS · Participants
Sativex: 0
Placebo: 0
Total: 0
Sativex: 97
Placebo: 119
Total: 216
Sativex: 52
Placebo: 29
Total: 81
Age, Continuous
MEAN · years
Sativex: 60.8 ± 10.38
Placebo: 58.2 ± 10.57
Total: 59.5 ± 10.54
Sex: Female, Male
COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS · Participants
Sativex: 56
Placebo: 58
Total: 114
Sativex: 93
Placebo: 90
Total: 183
Region of Enrollment
NUMBER · participants
Sativex: 91
Placebo: 86
Total: 177
Sativex: 34
Placebo: 37
Total: 71
Sativex: 24
Placebo: 25
Total: 49
SafetyAdverse events reported
Sativex
Serious: 14 / 149Other: 120 / 149
Placebo
Serious: 12 / 148Other: 101 / 148
Serious adverse-event terms (32)
Event
System
Groups: affected / at risk
ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME
Cardiac disorders
Sativex: 1 / 149 · Placebo: 0 / 148
BRADYCARDIA
Cardiac disorders
Sativex: 1 / 149 · Placebo: 0 / 148
MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
Cardiac disorders
Sativex: 1 / 149 · Placebo: 1 / 148
EYE HAEMORRHAGE
Eye disorders
Sativex: 0 / 149 · Placebo: 1 / 148
GASTROINTESTINAL INFLAMMATION
Gastrointestinal disorders
Sativex: 1 / 149 · Placebo: 0 / 148
PERIODONTITIS
Gastrointestinal disorders
Sativex: 1 / 149 · Placebo: 0 / 148
ABDOMINAL PAIN
Gastrointestinal disorders
Sativex: 0 / 149 · Placebo: 1 / 148
GASTRITIS
Gastrointestinal disorders
Sativex: 0 / 149 · Placebo: 1 / 148
HAEMATEMESIS
Gastrointestinal disorders
Sativex: 0 / 149 · Placebo: 1 / 148
IMPAIRED GASTRIC EMPTYING
Gastrointestinal disorders
Sativex: 0 / 149 · Placebo: 1 / 148
NAUSEA
Gastrointestinal disorders
Sativex: 0 / 149 · Placebo: 1 / 148
VOMITING
Gastrointestinal disorders
Sativex: 0 / 149 · Placebo: 1 / 148
OEDEMA PERIPHERAL
General disorders
Sativex: 0 / 149 · Placebo: 1 / 148
PYREXIA
General disorders
Sativex: 0 / 149 · Placebo: 1 / 148
CELLULITIS
Infections and infestations
Sativex: 1 / 149 · Placebo: 0 / 148
LOWER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION
Infections and infestations
Sativex: 1 / 149 · Placebo: 0 / 148
BLOOD GLUCOSE INCREASED
Investigations
Sativex: 0 / 149 · Placebo: 1 / 148
DIABETIC KETOACIDOSIS
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Sativex: 1 / 149 · Placebo: 0 / 148
HYPERGLYCAEMIA
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Sativex: 1 / 149 · Placebo: 0 / 148
KETOACIDOSIS
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Sativex: 1 / 149 · Placebo: 0 / 148
DIABETES MELLITUS INADEQUATE CONTROL
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Sativex: 0 / 149 · Placebo: 1 / 148
BACK PAIN
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Sativex: 1 / 149 · Placebo: 0 / 148
EXOSTOSIS
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Sativex: 1 / 149 · Placebo: 0 / 148
MUSCULOSKELETAL CHEST PAIN
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Sativex: 0 / 149 · Placebo: 1 / 148
RHABDOMYOLYSIS
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Sativex: 0 / 149 · Placebo: 1 / 148
ISCHAEMIC STROKE
Nervous system disorders
Sativex: 1 / 149 · Placebo: 0 / 148
SYNCOPE
Nervous system disorders
Sativex: 1 / 149 · Placebo: 0 / 148
TRANSIENT ISCHAEMIC ATTACK
Nervous system disorders
Sativex: 0 / 149 · Placebo: 1 / 148
RENAL FAILURE
Renal and urinary disorders
Sativex: 0 / 149 · Placebo: 1 / 148
ESSENTIAL HYPERTENSION
Vascular disorders
Sativex: 1 / 149 · Placebo: 0 / 148
PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASE
Vascular disorders
Sativex: 1 / 149 · Placebo: 0 / 148
ACCELERATED HYPERTENSION
Vascular disorders
Sativex: 0 / 149 · Placebo: 1 / 148
Other adverse-event terms (34)
Event
System
Groups: affected / at risk
Dizziness
Nervous system disorders
Sativex: 42 / 149 · Placebo: 7 / 148
Somnolence
Nervous system disorders
Sativex: 11 / 149 · Placebo: 7 / 148
Headache
Nervous system disorders
Sativex: 9 / 149 · Placebo: 11 / 148
Lethargy
Nervous system disorders
Sativex: 5 / 149 · Placebo: 1 / 148
Amnesia
Nervous system disorders
Sativex: 4 / 149 · Placebo: 2 / 148
Dysgeusia
Nervous system disorders
Sativex: 4 / 149 · Placebo: 1 / 148
Memory impairment
Nervous system disorders
Sativex: 4 / 149 · Placebo: 1 / 148
Nausea
Gastrointestinal disorders
Sativex: 25 / 149 · Placebo: 15 / 148
Vomiting
Gastrointestinal disorders
Sativex: 14 / 149 · Placebo: 11 / 148
Dry mouth
Gastrointestinal disorders
Sativex: 12 / 149 · Placebo: 4 / 148
Diarrhoea
Gastrointestinal disorders
Sativex: 10 / 149 · Placebo: 14 / 148
Oral pain
Gastrointestinal disorders
Sativex: 7 / 149 · Placebo: 0 / 148
Abdominal pain upper
Gastrointestinal disorders
Sativex: 5 / 149 · Placebo: 2 / 148
Mouth ulceration
Gastrointestinal disorders
Sativex: 4 / 149 · Placebo: 2 / 148
Oral discomfort
Gastrointestinal disorders
Sativex: 4 / 149 · Placebo: 4 / 148
Fatigue
General disorders
Sativex: 10 / 149 · Placebo: 4 / 148
Feeling abnormal
General disorders
Sativex: 4 / 149 · Placebo: 0 / 148
Oedema peripheral
General disorders
Sativex: 4 / 149 · Placebo: 2 / 148
Nasopharyngitis
Infections and infestations
Sativex: 8 / 149 · Placebo: 6 / 148
Lower respiratory tract infection
Infections and infestations
Sativex: 6 / 149 · Placebo: 8 / 148
Urinary tract infection
Infections and infestations
Sativex: 2 / 149 · Placebo: 8 / 148
Disorientation
Psychiatric disorders
Postural drop of 20mmHg or more in systolic blood pressure at screening.
Medical history of gastroparesis.
Evidence of cardiomyopathy.
Experienced myocardial infarction or clinically relevant cardiac dysfunction within the last 12 months or had a cardiac disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator would put the subject at risk of a clinically relevant arrhythmia or myocardial infarction.
QT interval; of \> 450 ms (males) or \> 470 ms (females) at Visit 1.
Secondary or tertiary AV block or sinus bradycardia (HR \<50bpm) or sinus tachycardia (HR\>110bpm) at Visit 1.
Diastolic blood pressure of \<50 mmHg or \>105 mmHg in a sitting position at rest for five minutes prior to randomisation.
Impaired renal function i.e., creatinine clearance is lower than 50 ml/min at Visit 1.
Significantly impaired hepatic function, at Visit 1, in the investigator's opinion.
Female subjects of child bearing potential and male subjects whose partner was of child bearing potential, unless they were willing to ensure that they or their partner used effective contraception during the study and for three months thereafter.
If female, were pregnant or lactating, or were planning pregnancy during the course of the study and for three months thereafter.
Received an IMP within the 12 weeks before Visit 1.
Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the investigator, may either put the subject at risk because of participation in the study, may influence the result of the study, or the subject's ability to participate in the study.
Following a physical exam, the subject had any abnormalities that, in the opinion of the investigator, would prevent the subject from safely participating in the study.
Intention to donate blood during the study.
Intention to travel internationally during the study.
Previous randomisation into this study.
Change From Baseline in Mean Quality of Life EuroQol 5-D Weighted Health State Index Score at the End of Treatment Measured by Visual Analogue Scale
Time frame: Day 0 and Day 98
The EuroQol-5D Health Status Visual Analogue Scale rated the health state on a scale of 0-100 with 0 = worst health state imaginable to 100 = best health state imaginable. An increase in score indicates an improvement in condition.
Change From Baseline in the Use of Rescue Analgesia at the End of Treatment
Time frame: Day 0 - Day 98
The mean daily number of paracetamol tablets used were calculated for the periods over which the primary endpoint was calculated.
Incidence of Adverse Events as a Measure of Subject Safety
Time frame: Day 0 - Day 133
The number of subjects who experienced an adverse event during the course of the study (including the follow-up period i.e 28 days after the end of treatment) is presented.
Change From Baseline in Mean Intoxication 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale Score at the End of Treatment
Time frame: Day 0 - Day 98
Subjects rated their intoxication levels on a scale of 0-10, where 0 equals "no intoxication" and 10 equals "extreme intoxication". A negaitve value from baseline indicates and improvement. End of treatment was classed as the last on-treatment visit where data was recorded.